Hola! Aloha! Szia!
Hi! I’m Devo! I’m a Penn Presidential Ph.D. Fellow, a Fontaine Fellow, and a Joint Doctoral Student in the Annenberg School for Communication and in the Department of Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania. I presently hold two doctoral fellowship positions at Penn, the first within the Center on Digital Culture and Society (CDCS), where I lead and facilitate the Digital Activism & Data Justice (DADJ) research group, and the second in the Center for Advanced Research in Global Communication (CARCG). In addition to my doctoral fellowship positions at Annenberg, I also serve as the graduate student representative to the Digital Culture research cluster in the Department of Sociology.
A digital native and professional internet “lurker,” my research sits at the intersection of social movement studies, economic sociology, digital cultures, and performance theory. Broadly, my work examines forms of digital activism in contention with global financial markets to make sense of the political, cultural, and social consequences that the digitization of financial markets has had on our society. In studying these forms of financial activism, my work also attempts to reexamine the lifecycles of social movements, theorizing around the emergence and coalescence stages while also reconsidering how we conceptualize the success and failures of social movements in the digital age.
I began my doctoral studies intellectually consumed with how groups shape their collective identities online in order to understand why social movement participation has swelled in recent years, and this interest still remains central to my research endeavors. In reevaluating the lifecycles and temporality of digital activism and, therefore, social movements, my work also contends with the notion that collective identity formation is no longer important to the emergence and sustainment of social movements today. Rather, I argue it plays an increasingly important role, especially in an era where social movements appear more diffuse.
Prior to returning to academia, I spent my early career in the public service, which played a formative role in shaping my research agenda. Keenly aware of the academic-practitioner divide, I believe that academic research must be accessible and relevant to practitioners and activists since they are often best positioned to make strides in achieving societal change we are in desperate need of. In a small effort to bridge this gap, I am fortunate enough to hold an appointment as an Associate within the School of Professional Studies at Columbia University, where I have had the opportunity to support the teaching of Visual Communication, Communication Research and Insights, and Political Communication to graduate students in the M.S. in Strategic Communication program.
I earned both an M.A. in Communication and an M.A. in Sociology from Penn in 2024 and an M.S. in Strategic Communication from Columbia University in 2020. Before attending graduate school, I obtained my B.A. in History and Religious Studies from Arizona State University in 2016. Upon graduating, I received the highest honor awarded by the university: the Dean’s Medal Award for the School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies.
Research Interests
Digital Cultures
According to Deuze (2005), a digital culture is “an emerging value-system and set of expectations as particularly expressed in the activities of news and information media makers and users online.” Digital cultures emerge and are enacted through the expression of individualization, post-nationalism, and globalization.
Collective Identity
Polletta and Jasper (2001) state that collective identity is “an individual’s cognitive, moral, and emotional connection with a broader community, category, practice, or institution. It is a perception of a shared status or relation, which may be imagined rather than experienced directly, and it is distinct from personal identities, although it may form part of a personal identity.”
Performance as Endurance
Shalson (2018) describes endurance as a form and claims: “it involves a plan and a following through of that plan... (except that) the plan, like all plans, can never guarantee its outcome in advance.” She further elaborates, suggesting that “Endurance is built on a plan, then, but this plan does not fully dictate what the work becomes. The artist designs and then endures an unfolding of events that can never be fixed from the start. This indeterminacy arises from another essential element of endurance: namely, that it is always performed in relation to forces that are beyond the performer’s control.”